
D-SLR DOF and interchangeable lenses, but can it compare to video D-SLRs?
Like most videographers, I felt a very strong pull towards D-SLR cameras with 1080p recording (like the Canon 5D Mk II) as they offer the kind of DOF that would cost a fortune to achieve with a video camera (even if you go for the 35mm lens adapter option). But while they’re a nice option, they come with a bunch of issues that cool my enthusiasm.
I read on DP Review that Panasonic is launching a new video camera based on – wait for it – the Micro Four Thirds image system they co-developed with Olympus for D-SLRs. Hit up the link to find more about the facts and figures, but here are my thoughts on the subject.
First up, I absolutely hate the styling (it’s never really been the broadcast and professional team’s strongpoint), but this goes deeper than simple aesthetics. It looks potentially front-heavy – particularly if you whack a nice zoom lens on the front – and while I can’t see the grip on the other side, my guess is that using this thing for any length of time isn’t going to be a comfortable affair.
It’s also AVCHD – 4.1.1/4.2.0 most likely, otherwise they’d be shouting about the ‘pro’ AVCHD100 standard – and I’m also guessing that over/undercranking won’t be making an apppearance here. That said, it’ll probably have way better filtering than these video D-SLRs do, and dual balanced XLRs will make it a much better option for recording audio alongside your pictures (without the D-SLR drifting I’ve heard about).
Lenses like this one can be picked up pretty cheaply, and the SDHC SDXCrecording media marks a change from the awful P2 card trap that users like myself find themselves in. So I have to admit, I’m pretty curious as to the market and price point for this camera. I reckon (and this is a wild stab in the dark) it’ll hit Australian shores in 2011, and will cost around the $4K mark.